A fiery debate is breaking out across Beverly Hills as people at tony hair salons, gas stations and stores weigh in on whether the city of the rich and famous should become the first in the U.S. to outlaw the sale of tobacco products everywhere except a few cigar lounges.
With the City Council set to consider a proposed ordinance Tuesday night, abstainers said yes to the idea, and the sooner the better, while smokers protested, no way.
“It’s a ridiculous idea,” hair stylist Giuseppe Franco shouted soon after lighting up a Marlboro Light on a breezeway just outside the upscale hair salon that bears his name.
“First off, let’s be honest. Smoking is bad. I don’t let my daughter smoke,” he said during a sometimes profane tirade delivered between puffs.
“But it’s going to hurt my friends,” he said, pointing out that a 24-hour Rite Aid pharmacy down the street does big business in cigarettes that go for about $8 a pack.
So does the Union 76 gas station a couple blocks away, where the cashier says they sell about 50 packs a day at $12 apiece.
California is among at least 25 states that outlaw smoking in workplaces, restaurants and bars. It also has one of the highest cigarette taxes in the country — nearly $3 a pack.
Beverly Hills already restricts the sale of menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products.
But the proposed ordinance would go much further, banning all tobacco products from grocery stores, pharmacies, hotels and gas stations in the city of 34,000 people between West Hollywood and Los Angeles.
“My celebrity clients smoke,” Franco fumed.
Like most Beverly Hills business people, he won’t name them, but he did pull out a copy of the hotel magazine Concierge featuring a photo of him with his buddy Arnold Schwarzenegger, a cigar aficionado.
Cigar smokers most likely won’t have to sacrifice if the ordinance is adopted. A city staff report recommends exempting three tony cigar lounges in Beverly Hills.
Still, the folks at one of them, Nazareth’s Fine Cigars, weren’t happy.
“They’re going to chase the tourists out of here,” said retired businessman John Davis as he relaxed in a comfortable lounge chair, cigar in hand.
These days, many people visit Beverly Hills from Asia and Europe, he said, where smoking is commonplace. Sure, if the ordinance is passed, they’ll still stroll Rodeo Drive with its high-end stores like Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Cartier, and try to pick out Larry King and other celebrities making their way to Nate ‘N Al’s deli for breakfast.
But they’ll head to West Hollywood to buy their smokes because cigarette sales would even be banned in famous places like the Beverly Wilshire, the hotel where Julia Roberts’ character stayed in “Pretty Woman,” the movie that made her a star.
Not everyone in Beverly Hills is a wealthy celebrity, of course. While the median price of a home is more than $2 million and the median annual income is more than $103,000, about 9 percent of the population actually falls below the poverty line, according to the U.S. Census.
The gas stations, pharmacies and other places offering modest jobs and cigarettes are tucked into corners just off Rodeo Drive and other fashionable streets. Only 28 sell tobacco products, according to the city staff report.
The city report cites the hazards of smoking and the desire of Beverly Hills to be a healthy city as reasons for the ban on tobacco sales.
For non-smokers Oscar Melendez and Cezar Diaz, that’s reason enough to support it.
“I can pick up cigarette smoke from 30 feet away,” Melendez said, noting that secondhand smoke is bad for everyone and that it drifts from the sidewalk by his valet parking stand into nearby restaurants.
At the fashionable Sarah Pacini clothing store, it gets so bad that Diaz, the manager, says he sometimes has to close the door and ask smokers not to stand on the sidewalk out front.
Most, he said, respond politely.
This story has been corrected to remove an erroneous reference to the hotel where Julia Roberts’ character stayed in “Pretty Woman”; and to fix the spelling of Vuitton.
Source: Read Full Article